The Remote Hiring Crisis in Tech No One Wants to Talk About

Everyone’s talking about AI. Fewer are talking about what it’s doing to hiring especially in tech. Interviews are noisier. Signals are weaker. And for founders trying to build lean, high-trust teams, the hiring process has started to feel… broken.

At Bamboo X, we’re not watching this from the sidelines. We’re deep in the trenches of early-stage recruiting for tech and design roles. We work with funded startups every week who are building their first product teams and increasingly, they're telling us the same thing:

“We’re getting flooded with resumes. But we don’t trust any of them.”
“We just let someone go after two weeks. They crushed the interview. But they couldn’t actually do the job.”
“We’re scared to post on LinkedIn. It’s all noise.”

We recently read Gergely Orosz’s breakdown on The Pragmatic Engineer about the state of remote hiring. It didn’t just resonate — it confirmed everything we’re seeing on the frontlines.

Here’s what’s really going on, and what founders need to do next.

1. AI Is Killing the Signal at Every Stage

Hiring used to be about identifying great engineers through track record, thoughtful resumes, and real conversations. Now?

• Resumes are templated and often written by ChatGPT.

• Cover letters are mass-generated and sent to 100+ roles at once.

• Coding interviews are cheated, with candidates using invisible AI overlays or whispering to voice assistants.

• Take-homes are completed by AI and sometimes reveal it with embarrassing accuracy.

At Maestro.dev, the hiring manager embedded a “honeypot” instruction in white text inside the take-home coding brief. The line told AI tools to include an extra endpoint in the API that human devs wouldn’t catch. Four out of four submissions included it. Three claimed they hadn’t used AI at all.

We’ve seen the same: candidates who “ace” technical screens, but when asked to tweak their own code, can’t explain basic logic or even locate elements in the file.

2. Remote Interviews Are Being Gamed, Invisibly

One story from the article stands out. A senior engineer at a remote SaaS company was hired after passing interviews convincingly. Within two weeks, their manager suspected something was off. The engineer couldn't speak coherently about technologies they claimed to have used for years. Under pressure, they admitted to using three tools during their interview:

• ChatGPT with voice mode on a hidden phone

• Interview Coder, an invisible overlay

• iAsk, an AI tool designed to answer live questions in interviews

They were let go immediately.

We’ve seen this too — candidates feeding live prompts to tools during technical calls, or freezing when the conversation shifts off-script. Remote video interviews are no longer reliable if you’re trying to test for deep thinking, collaboration, or communication.

3. LinkedIn Is No Longer a Viable Hiring Platform

Hiring through LinkedIn has become a game of chance and not in a good way.

Here’s what we (and others) are seeing:

• Posts get swarmed with 100+ applicants in minutes

• Many are clearly fake accounts or bot-generated submissions

• "Easy Apply" encourages spam-style applications, often without the candidate even reading the job post

• Filtering through all that noise takes dozens of hours with very little upside

Even worse, LinkedIn’s monetization model actually rewards volume. Recruiters often have to pay to unlock resumes, only to find low-quality applications waiting behind the paywall.

One founder quoted in the article said they had to shut down their listing after 50+ “fake” applications came through in under an hour. We’ve had clients do the same. Now, most of our sourcing at Bamboo X happens off LinkedIn.

4. Referrals and DMs Are Quietly Beating All Other Channels

Here’s what still works — and it’s not fancy:

• Personalized DMs from serious candidates

• Warm referrals from trusted team members or operators

• Direct outreach from recruiters who vet beyond a resume

One hiring lead said their most promising candidates were the ones who skipped the job boards and reached out directly with intent. We see the same. Most of our best placements start with a shared network, not an application.

It’s slower. It doesn’t scale like a job post. But it’s the only reliable way left to hire without risking a complete mismatch.

5. Trial Work Is the New Interview

Live interviews are getting gamed. Take-homes are being AI’d to death. So what’s the alternative?

Some companies are shifting to paid work trials — one or two weeks of scoped, hands-on work. Linear does this by inviting candidates into the real dev environment, letting them lead a small greenfield project with team support. It’s paid. It’s real. And it works.

We’ve helped several of our clients implement the same model. One early-stage founder now uses short-term contracts as a screening tool before making full-time offers. Others offer a project-based engagement with a clear path to convert.

Not everyone can afford this time-wise. But if you’re building a small team where every hire matters, a 2-week trial is a lot cheaper than a 6-month mistake.

6. Trial Periods Are Making a Quiet Comeback

For years, “probation” periods felt like a formality. That’s changing.

Founders and hiring managers are starting to treat the first 30–60 days as a serious trial. Not in a threatening way but as a mutual test. Can this person do the work? Are they who they said they were?

In high-trust hiring, this is a powerful filter. Especially if you’ve been burned before.

7. And Yes, Hiring Is More Expensive — Especially If You Do It Blind

Recruiting budgets are being eaten alive by low-quality volume. One agency reported spending $140K a year on LinkedIn Recruiter seats and InMail credits alone. That’s before even hiring anyone.

Most early-stage startups don’t have that kind of cash. Which is why so many are turning to targeted, relationship-driven recruiting — the kind we specialize in at Bamboo X.

We build shortlists from real networks. We backchannel candidates. We don’t flood your inbox with 50 resumes. You get 2 or 3 people worth talking to, not 20 you have to screen.

What Founders Should Take Away From This

If you’re hiring right now — especially remotely — here’s the bottom line:

• Don’t trust resumes blindly

• Don’t rely on job boards for serious roles

• Don’t assume interviews alone will tell you the truth

Instead:

• Start with people you or your trusted network can vouch for

• Add paid trial work or project-based screening when possible

• Treat early hires like co-founders, not employees  and vet accordingly

• Get help from recruiters who actually know how to filter for real signal

That’s what we do at Bamboo X. We’re not spraying resumes. We’re helping you build the kind of team that can ship, scale, and stay.

WANT MORE INSIGHTS LIKE THIS?

Fill out the form below.

If you found this breakdown helpful and want more real-world insights into what’s working (and not working) in tech hiring, subscribe to Bamboo X. We talk to the people building startups every day — and we keep the conversation honest. No hype. Just practical learnings and founder-first strategies.